<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: review: Daybreakers (2010)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.averagefilmreviews.com/2010/01/review-daybreakers-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.averagefilmreviews.com/2010/01/review-daybreakers-2010/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 11:22:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ros</title>
		<link>http://www.averagefilmreviews.com/2010/01/review-daybreakers-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-1138</link>
		<dc:creator>ros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 08:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.averagefilmreviews.com/?p=504#comment-1138</guid>
		<description>Well I never saw the trailer, never heard the hype, just saw that there was a film with vampires in it. I really enjoyed this, yes it had the potential to be a little gem, but even as it stands it&#039;s still a *great* vampire film and I&#039;ve never understood the criticism. That said, ...and I think I&#039;ve already given it away, I have a penchant for modern vamp films -Underworld, Blade, I&#039;ve even secretly had to watch that other trilogy whose name I will not mention -getting down with my inner angsty, teenage girl. Ugh! I would recommend spoof-film Vampires Suck just for the send up of Twilight&#039;s starlet Kristen Stewart, very satisfying. Can&#039;t believe I watched the third one too though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I never saw the trailer, never heard the hype, just saw that there was a film with vampires in it. I really enjoyed this, yes it had the potential to be a little gem, but even as it stands it&#8217;s still a *great* vampire film and I&#8217;ve never understood the criticism. That said, &#8230;and I think I&#8217;ve already given it away, I have a penchant for modern vamp films -Underworld, Blade, I&#8217;ve even secretly had to watch that other trilogy whose name I will not mention -getting down with my inner angsty, teenage girl. Ugh! I would recommend spoof-film Vampires Suck just for the send up of Twilight&#8217;s starlet Kristen Stewart, very satisfying. Can&#8217;t believe I watched the third one too though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip</title>
		<link>http://www.averagefilmreviews.com/2010/01/review-daybreakers-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 13:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.averagefilmreviews.com/?p=504#comment-138</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d agree with your conclusions on this one, expected so much but it failed miserably in it&#039;s execution. It got a bit silly about half way through and went downhill from there. A case of good trailer - crap film.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d agree with your conclusions on this one, expected so much but it failed miserably in it&#8217;s execution. It got a bit silly about half way through and went downhill from there. A case of good trailer &#8211; crap film.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

