<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>average film reviews : Ireland &#124; movie reviews, clips and trailers... &#187; mystery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.averagefilmreviews.com/category/reviews-by-genre/mystery-reviews-by-genre/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.averagefilmreviews.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 19:00:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>review: The Lovely Bones (2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.averagefilmreviews.com/2010/02/review-the-lovely-bones-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.averagefilmreviews.com/2010/02/review-the-lovely-bones-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 16:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicola-t</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[6/10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cinema reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mystery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thriller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[based on a book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mark wahlberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[murder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peter jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rachel weisz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[saoirse ronan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stanley tucci]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[susan sarandon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Lovely Bones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.averagefilmreviews.com/?p=663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems like people have been talking about The Lovely Bones for ages&#8230; Well actually they have been. The fact that the Irish release date was moved back twice has not particularly helped with this but with a very staggered worldwide release and the presence of Irish actress, Saoirse Ronan, we really have been hearing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.averagefilmreviews.com/2010/02/review-the-lovely-bones-2009/the-lovely-bones-poster-150/" rel="attachment wp-att-664"><img style="margin:20px 20px 10px;" src="http://www.averagefilmreviews.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/the-lovely-bones-poster-150.jpg" alt="the lovely bones poster saoirse ronan" title="The Lovely Bones Poster" width="150" height="221" class="alignright size-full wp-image-664" /></a></p>
<p>It seems like people have been talking about <strong><a target="_blank" href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0380510/"><i>The Lovely Bones</i></a></strong> for ages&#8230; </p>
<p>Well actually they have been. The fact that the Irish release date was moved back twice has not particularly helped with this but with a very staggered worldwide release and the presence of Irish actress, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1519680/">Saoirse Ronan</a>, we really have been hearing about <i>The Lovely Bones</i> for a long time now. </p>
<p>By the way in case you&#8217;re not Irish and you&#8217;re wondering how to pronounce Saoirse, it&#8217;s <i>seer-sha</i>&#8230; now you know.</p>
<p>Anyway, I had been looking forward to <i>The Lovely Bones</i> for a long time. I started reading <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Lovely_Bones">the book</a> ages ago but I never really got passed the first few chapters. It&#8217;s not that I didn&#8217;t like it, I actually found it extremely emotionally moving, I just don&#8217;t read that much so when I put it down I never got around to picking it back up. I knew there was a film coming out eventually so I thought I would just wait for it.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t really work out if this was a mistake or not. The reason I picked it up in the first place was that I heard it was an excellent book. Unfortunately it&#8217;s not an excellent movie. I wouldn&#8217;t say it&#8217;s a bad movie. There are plently of <a target="_blank" href="http://recordcatspajamas.blogspot.com/2010/01/lovely-bones-movie-irresponsible-bad.html">other</a> <a target="_blank" href="http://www.rcreader.com/movies/goner-baby-goner-lovely-bones/">people</a> <a target="_blank" href="http://www.movieweb.com/movie/FIfEcifj2JV8ig/REnWKsrnQ5lVrq">out</a> there who are saying that&#8230; I disagree. However I can&#8217;t in good conscience say that it&#8217;s a very good movie. Maybe I should have read it. On the other hand if I had read it I might have been more disappointed so perhaps I am better off. I should probably read it now.</p>
<p>The problem here is that the film is just completely out of balance. The whole fantasy world thing looks beautiful and perhaps in the book it all ties together somehow but in the film it just seems out of place. As a result those scenes serve as an interruption to what could be, and mostly is, a compelling story of a father trying to find his daughter&#8217;s killer while his family falls apart. I&#8217;d love to say that they should have just thrown out the heaven sequences but I assume that, if you&#8217;ve read the book, it would mean that you&#8217;re really just making a completely different film. Also it would have left Saoirse Ronan pretty much on the cutting room floor and she was actually pretty good. </p>
<p>There are some strong performances in this film. I really enjoyed what little we saw of <a target="_blank" href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000215/">Susan Sarandon</a> and <a target="_blank" href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0408284/">Michael Imperioli</a>. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001804/">Stanley Tucci</a> was particularly excellent as George Harvey; I personally felt a genuine disgust toward him. You root for his demise over any legally meted justice in this case. He is absolutely deserving of his Oscar nomination, he&#8217;s been a fine actor in everything I&#8217;ve ever seen him in and he&#8217;s really well overdue for this recognition. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000242/">Mark Wahlberg</a> and <a target="_blank" href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001838/">Rachel Weisz</a> were also sufficient in their roles. I have no complaints about them.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s just so unfortunate that this film went wrong. There are some really great scenes and great performance but overall it just didn&#8217;t work. Oh, also there are a few lame scenes toward the end which I assume are in the book and probably make sense there. In the film they are quite jarring. By then though it&#8217;s just kind of like, oh well. </p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t go so far as to say that people shouldn&#8217;t go see it&#8230; it&#8217;s a story worth seeing, but I would warn people not too expect to much from it. Mitigate your expectations and hopefully you will enjoy it.</p>
<p>6/10</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.averagefilmreviews.com/2010/02/review-the-lovely-bones-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>review: Sherlock Holmes (2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.averagefilmreviews.com/2010/01/sherlock-holmes-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.averagefilmreviews.com/2010/01/sherlock-holmes-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 23:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicola-t</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[7.5/10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cinema reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mystery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guy Ritchie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jude Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Downey Jr.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sherlock Holmes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.averagefilmreviews.com/?p=313</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apparently there have been many many many screen incarnations of Sherlock Holmes&#8230;. I haven&#8217;t seen any of them though. I actually know pretty much nothing about Sherlock Holmes beyond the fact that he&#8217;s a detective, he&#8217;s got a friend called Watson and he lives at 221B Baker&#8217;s Street. That last one was courtesy of a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.averagefilmreviews.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/sherlock-holmes-poster-150.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-314" style="margin: 20px 20px 10px;" title="Sherlock Holmes poster" src="http://www.averagefilmreviews.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/sherlock-holmes-poster-150.jpg" alt="sherlock holmes poster" width="150" height="224" /></a><br />
Apparently there have been many many many screen incarnations of <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sherlock_Holmes">Sherlock Holmes</a>&#8230;. I haven&#8217;t seen any of them though. I actually know pretty much nothing about Sherlock Holmes beyond the fact that he&#8217;s a detective, he&#8217;s got a friend called Watson and he lives at 221B Baker&#8217;s Street. That last one was courtesy of a recent <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pub_quiz">table quiz</a>.</p>
<p>This latest film adaptation is <a target="_blank" href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0005363/">Guy Ritchie</a>&#8216;s version of <a target="_blank" href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0988045/"><em>Sherlock Holmes</em></a>. I haven&#8217;t seen many Guy Ritchie films, nothing against him but I just haven&#8217;t been interested in anything he&#8217;s made. Well, I was almost interested in <a target="_blank" href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1032755/"><em>RocknRolla</em></a> but then it just passed by&#8230; out of interest; people who did see it, was it any good?</p>
<p>So&#8230; not knowing much about Sherlock Holmes and not having an opinion on Guy Ritchie meant that I was fairly unencumbered by expectations. Actually come to think of it I don&#8217;t know why I went to see it at all&#8230; I wasn&#8217;t even particularly interested when I saw the trailer&#8230; Whatever the reason, New Year&#8217;s eve saw me at the newly opened <a target="_blank" href="http://www.swancinemas.ie">Swan Cinemas</a> in Rathmines at 1.40pm heading to Sherlock Holmes&#8230;.</p>
<p>&#8230; and I&#8217;m glad I did. This is a fun movie. Throughly enjoyable from start to finish. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000375/">Robert Downey Jr.</a>, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000179/">Jude Law</a> and <a target="_blank" href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1046097/">Rachel McAdams</a> are all excellent choices for their roles and the plot is engaging and sufficiently mystery filled to sustain interest. Well actually the plot is a bit randomly complicated but I felt it worked for the characters so that was grand.</p>
<p>Aside from that there isn&#8217;t a whole lot to say. It&#8217;s a detective movie with some action thrown in&#8230; oh yeah. The costumes and sets are cool as well, is this eligible for an Oscar? They love that period kind of stuff.</p>
<p>Anyway I heartily recommend this if you&#8217;re looking for a fun easy watch this weekend and I for one hope they get to make that sequel.</p>
<p>7.5/10</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.averagefilmreviews.com/2010/01/sherlock-holmes-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

