<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>average film reviews : Ireland &#124; movie reviews, clips and trailers... &#187; great scream</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.averagefilmreviews.com/tag/great-scream/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.averagefilmreviews.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 19:00:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>review: Paranormal Activity (2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.averagefilmreviews.com/2009/12/paranormal-activity-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.averagefilmreviews.com/2009/12/paranormal-activity-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 21:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicola-t</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[5/10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cinema reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cult]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[horror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2007]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cinema]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ghost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[great scream]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paranormal Activity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thriller]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.averagefilmreviews.com/2009/12/paranormal-activity-2009/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well technically Paranormal Activity came out in 2007 but it only got a cinema release in 2009, so (2009) it is. Not that it matters but anyway&#8230; better get on with this. The force is strong with this one. Umm&#8230; the Paramount marketing force that is. This is apparently now the most profitable movie of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.averagefilmreviews.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/paranormal-activity-poster-150.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-170" style="margin: 20px 20px 10px; float: right; cursor: pointer; width: 135px; height: 200px;" title="paranormal-activity-poster-150" src="http://www.averagefilmreviews.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/paranormal-activity-poster-150.jpg" alt="Paranormal Activity poster" width="150" height="222" /></a>Well technically <a target="_blank" href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1179904/"><em>Paranormal Activity</em></a> came out in 2007 but it only got a cinema release in 2009, so (2009) it is. Not that it matters but anyway&#8230; better get on with this.</p>
<p>The force is strong with this one. Umm&#8230; the Paramount marketing force that is. This is apparently now the most profitable movie of all time. So of course, I wasn&#8217;t expecting much going in to it. Actually I genuinely wasn&#8217;t&#8230; I do wonder if I would have been better off carrying a bit of anticipation though, because as it was, I didn&#8217;t think that much of it. Maybe I would have enjoyed it more if I hadn&#8217;t been expecting so little?</p>
<p>In the interest of full disclosure I should probably mention that I felt very sick for the last 30 mins or so of this film. I was only queasy for the middle 30 mins. I&#8217;ve always had a problem with motion sickness and the whole shaky hand held camera really gets me. I can&#8217;t even watch people playing First Person Shooters and this was well beyond that. The last time I felt it this bad was at <a target="_blank" href="http://www.averagefilmreviews.com/2008/02/cloverfield-2008/"><em>Cloverfield</em></a>. It was a bit more tolerable during <em>Cloverfield</em> though. That might have been because the film was a bit more fun&#8230;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not that <em>Paranormal Activity</em> was a bad film, it wasn&#8217;t. It was fine. As I think it through though, I realise that I can&#8217;t really point at the &#8220;best bit&#8221;. Because there wasn&#8217;t a best bit. But then again there wasn&#8217;t really a worst bit either. There was a stupidest bit, but I&#8217;ll leave you to pick your own, if or when you see it. There were also some pointless bits. And yes, there were some scary bits. I guess what I&#8217;m saying here is that it was a bit bitty.</p>
<p>My main problem with it was that it was cheap. Not that it was cheap looking but that the scares were cheap. It was real &#8220;things that go bump in the night&#8221; scary. There was nothing that was really&#8230; &#8230; let&#8217;s just say I kind of expected there would be a more insidious creepiness to it. It was all a very straight up &#8220;BE SCARED NOW!&#8221; kind of thing. I would have liked to have seen a bit more thought behind it. Not that I like <a target="_blank" href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=jump%20scene">jump scenes</a> &#8211; like I said, cheap &#8211; but all the scares were pretty telegraphed and that was annoying. What&#8217;s the point of a jump scene you warn someone about?</p>
<p>Ah no, I&#8217;m not being entirely fair. I mean ok, I may have been watching a film starring the two least haunting aware characters I&#8217;ve ever seen but yer wan Katie really did have a great scream. I was well impressed with that. And I quite scared by it to a certain degree. I live alone in a two bed apartment and I&#8217;ve never been up to the attic so&#8230; uh&#8230; I&#8217;d rather not think about it. But it&#8217;s not like I had trouble sleeping or anything, it was no <a target="_blank" href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0070047/"><em>Exorcist</em></a> and it was certainly no <a target="_blank" href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0119081/"><em>Event Horizon</em></a></p>
<p>In the end, I was disappointed by this film. Which is not to say that I hated it. Or that I think that people shouldn&#8217;t be scared by it. On the contrary, I think many people are genuinely scared by it and there&#8217;s nothing wrong with that. I save my disdain for people who are into the stuff like <a target="_blank" href="http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/tv/interviews/a185387/derek-acorah-michael-jackson-the-live-seance.html"><em>Michael Jackson: The Live Seance</em></a>. I just didn&#8217;t think it was a great film.</p>
<p>I really think this might be one of those rare films that would be better on TV. I could imagine renting the DVD, watching it with a few friends and having a good time. Or watching it alone at home and being terrified. But in Screen 2 in The Savoy it just didn&#8217;t seem up to much.</p>
<p>Or who knows, maybe I was just put off by the nausea; it&#8217;s hard to appreciate an atmosphere when you think you might need to run to the bathroom to be sick any minute. I gotta start taking travel sickness tablets before watching these types of films&#8230;</p>
<p>5/10</p>
<p>NB: I am somewhat dismayed to see that there are plans for a <a target="_blank" href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1536044/"><em>Paranormal Activity 2</em></a>&#8230; did Hollywood learn nothing from <a target="_blank" href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0229260/"><em>Blair Witch 2</em></a>?</p>
<p>Also, shout out to the Paramount marketing team on this one. Great job folks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.averagefilmreviews.com/2009/12/paranormal-activity-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

